|
|
July 20
|
Title
|
Alone (2007) "Some bonds were never meant to be broken."
Director: Parkpoom WongPoom, Banjung Pisanthanakun | Starring: Marsha Wathanapanitch, Withaya Wasukraipaisan
|
|
|
|
Review
|
Caught this at GV's Blog Aloud session earlier this evening - must applaud GV for bringing down the two directors for a Q&A session, although the fact that I could not use my prize tickets for Cinema Europa and other screen times is a really frustrating point. Come on, GV marketing team, don't make it so hard for bloggers to do film reviews.
Alone is the second outing for directors Parkpoom and Banjung, who are better known as the brains behind the last scary Thai flick Shutter. This time, the chaps tackle the story of an ill-fated pair of Siamese twins (literally), Pim and Ploy, whose separation leaves one of them dead. The other goes on to Korea to make a fresh start in life, but when her mother suffers a stroke in Thailand, she is compelled to return to a home with bittersweet memories. Accompanied by her boyfriend, she finds herself terrorised by visions of her dead twin. Confused and afraid, she wonders if she is losing her sanity, but when her boyfriend begins to share her visions, a frightening secret begins to unravel.
I do wish the Q&A session had lasted longer - so many questions to ask and so little time. It's a shame that few in the audience had any questions when this was clearly a great opportunity to know the directors. They shared that the film took two years and a US$2.5m budget to materialise, and that this was a better outing for them than Shutter, because it gave them a lot more room to explore and experiment creatively.
I thought it was a little of both yes and no. While Alone clearly demonstrated more maturity and confidence behind the lens, it somehow lacks the lingering creepiness of Shutter, choosing to rely on more of the loud, sudden shock moments instead. That the script arc attempted too much in too little time also dragged down the credibility of the film, and that always hurts any horror flick. Credit must be given though, to the duo for working hard to create new creep moments in typical horror setpieces, and for acknowledging that they would not shy away from heavily utilised camera tricks and angles as long as they could refresh elements and as long as they were integral to the story. Fresh face Marsha also did a pretty commendable job in trying to portray the two key roles at the same time, although her weaknesses were due more to the awkwardness of the character development than her acting.
Nonetheless, Alone is still a pretty good scarefest, if you can overlook some of the plot's big loopholes and illogical points. Then again, if every female lead demonstrated some common sense when confronted with a big scary-looking house, most horror films would end in ten minutes. Just empty your mind, then go in and have a good scream!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running Time: Approximately 90min
Rating: PG | |  | |  |
May 04
|
DVD Title
|
Spider-man 2.1 (2007) "Everyone loves a hero."
Director: Sam Raimi | Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina, James Franco
|
|
|
|
DVD Specs
|
Region: 3 (S. Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Parts of S.E. Asia) | Format: Color, 2.40 : 1 | Number of discs: 2
Running Time: 136 min
Rating: PG
Studio: Columbia Pictures | Distributor: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Storyline:
Is there anyone who doesn't know the story? If you're reading this, you're probably wondering whether or not to plonk the cash down to see what you're missing before you catch Spidey 3, or if you caught Spidey 3 already, whether this DVD has anything really substantial to add to the trilogy. The answer, frustratingly enough, is yes and no. DVDs like these really bring out the worst in devious marketing gurus, who know that 8 minutes of extra footage can be enticing enough to trap Spidey fanboys and DVD completists (dammit, I succumbed - yups S-U-C-K-E-R alright).
Peter Parker is struggling with the death of his beloved Uncle Ben and mentor Norman Osborn (aka Green Goblin) from the first instalment. His buddy Harry, son of Osborn, wants revenge for his father, and his dream girl, Mary Jane, is getting tired of waiting for him to profess his love. Pile on rent and crummy grades, and a new tentacled villain, and Spider-man 2 is overflowing with intense drama, so can the new extended version really hold more? First of all, it's not exactly a fully-extended cut. The sequence where Spidey rides the elevator with a chuckling stranger, is even more hilarious now with loads of whacky quips, but this entirely replaces the original scene where Spidey is merely complimented on his suit, so if you want both versions, you gotta hang on to both discs. In any case, the extra features on the original DVD easily surpass the ones on 2.1, so it's definitely still a keeper (but more on that in the next section).
Nonetheless, there are other cool new fight scenes between Doc Ock and Spidey, and some other intimate moments (including more of CSI N.Y.'s Vanessa Ferlito) that all add up to make Spider-man 2 more complete (if that's possible) than before. The gem of the lot is a new sequence featuring J.K. Simmons, but I won't spoil the surprise. The only problem is that there's no doubt this was all a sickeningly calculated move to grab more cash, and if you aren't particularly swept up by Spidey-mania, then the eight minutes might not really turn you on that much anyway. Most stores (including Laser Flair and Gramophone) are selling this for S$27.90 but Arts Laser has it for S$26.90 so that's the cheapest deal I could find so far. But to sweeten the bitter taste of exploitation, Sony's marketing sleazeballs threw in a reprint copy of the issue that brings Spidey back to Earth in his new black suit plus some new artwork, as well as some decent extra features, so I don't know whether that's enough to make you buy into 2.1, but I think it's barely reasonable lah.
|
|
|
|
|
Video: 16 : 9 (Anamorphic widescreen) The clarity works against it in some parts, as I started to notice some of the CGI effects a little too clearly (or at least I don't seem to remember noticing them previously), but the overall presentation is just gorgeous. The only really annoying thing is that all the menu options on Disc Two are displayed in Japanese - what the hell?!?
Audio: English, Japanese, Thai 5.1 - Dolby Digital Subtitles: Chinese, English (not available on Disc Two), Japanese, Korean, Thai.
Commentary and Trivia Track I haven't had time to really watch either; the commentary doesn't involve any of the key cast or director, which makes you wonder how much he really approved of this DVD, but rather producer Laura Ziskin and screenwriter Alvin Sargent. The trivia track doesn't add that much, except integrating some links to a few new behind-the-scenes clips.
Extras:
* Inside 2.1 featurette (Approx 13mins) Essentially a log of the differences between the original cut and the new one, so don't watch this before you watch the film.
* Multi-Angle: Danny Elfman's Score (approx 4mins) A little bit of composing insight that reveals King Kong's influences on some parts of the score, but too short to really make much of an impact.
* With Great Effort comes Great Recognition featurette (approx 8mins) A collection of comments for the VFX crew who were awarded the Oscar for Best Visual Effects. Great if you like to hear these guys blow their trumpet, but not much else there.
* VFX Breakdowns (approx 8mins) The only real meat of Disc Two, this five-parter looks at preparation and development work for major setpieces in the movie, including the collapse of Doc Ock's floating headquarters and the fully computer-generated sequence of his demise. Relatively detailed but may be boring for those not into 3D overlays and the like.
* Spider-man 3 Sneak Peek, Villians (wah lau, spelling typo on official cover) (approx 5min total) A lame EPK containing snippets with Sam Raimi and the cast, and some snapshots of Venom and the Sandman, but nothing much that you wouldn't already have seen at Apple trailers, or on the sixtieth TV commercial at dinner-time.
Packaging:
* Foil slipcase over transparent amaray case * Comic book reprint (Black Spidey returns to Earth)
Advice: For once, extra footage that actually makes a good movie better - how rare is that? If you have cash to spare, this DVD is worth a buy, or certainly, even at least a spin. But as I said, if you only have money for one, and you haven't bought the original version, the old one is in fact better value for money, so choose your own web now.
|
|
Title
|
Lucky You (2007) "Life plays you whether you're ready or not."
Director: Curtis Hanson | Starring: Eric Bana, Drew Barrymore, Robert Duvall, Debra Messing
|
|
|
|
Review
|
First things first, an apology to my friend Liyi (if she ever reads this) for dragging her along on this free preview. Liyi has a lower tolerance level for slow-moving movies than I do, but even I have to concede that Lucky You is about as exciting as watching paint dry. I still bow to the greatness that is Curtis Hanson’s L.A. Confidential (even 8 Mile was surprisingly decent) so I went on blind faith, thinking this wouldn’t be too bad, and the disappointment was quite hard to take, despite a very promising, and possibly the only great, first five minutes with a pawnbroker.
Like the dodgy showman who sells you an entertaining skit before he puts out his mediocre wares, Lucky You disappoints not because it is poorly produced or shot, but simply because the film starts on a high, before flat-lining all the way through to the end. Eric Bana plays Huck Cheever, a talented Las Vegas poker player who cuts cards at the table with sharp hands and even sharper eyes, but mucks up his personal relationships like Mr Bean on crack. Up against his own estranged father and reigning champion L.C. Cheever (yeah, the Hokkien vulgarity synonym kind of fits him), played by a painfully under-utilised Robert Duvall, Huck must keep his personal emotions in check if he is to dethrone his old man.
But things are made even more challenging as he encounters the new girl in town, Billie Offer (Drew Barrymore), an aspiring singer who seems to be as good at reading people as he is, except that she believes in the goodness of people, sharing, trusting and sugar and spice, whereas Huck belongs to the camp of divide and conquer. This movie doesn’t have a lot going for it, and much of that is awkwardly obvious. Hanson based Lucky You (I haven’t figured what the title alludes to) on the world poker scene of 2003, when its popularity exploded with online avenues where average people could polish their card skills. 2003 was also the year when Chris Moneymaker became the poster-boy for Internet amateurs, by winning the Poker World Series and the $2.5m jackpot.
Unfortunately, the movie doesn’t bring across the same kind of energy or feverish intensity from the period it is supposed to portray. The film’s consultants may be impressed by the authenticity of its sets, but it is hardly gripping stuff. Poker is notoriously difficult to translate to screen (it’s no coincidence that Casino Royale’s driest bits are in its table sequences, but at least it had some tense distractions) and Hanson shows an alarming lack of awareness in allowing the movie to just build on technical jargon and a snail of a plot. In his desire to mirror the direct contrast between the qualities needed to succeed in poker and in relationships, i.e. deceit versus trust, Hanson seems to have forgotten about all the other fundamentals that make a good movie.
Non-gamblers (yups, that's the two of us) would be so lost in this movie’s cardspeak, while romantics would probably feel starved by the lack of chemistry amongst the entire cast. Everyone seems to be doing their own repetitive thing. Duvall slips into his veteran mode but doesn’t do much else with the unimaginative dialogue. Drew Barrymore rehashes her karaoke-Sophie from Music and Lyrics with a little less kookiness and a little more country lass charm, but is still as bland. Debra Messing (Will and Grace) is actually just about the only hot factor in this movie (oh, those alluring vocals and eyes) but her character is totally superfluous as Billie’s elder sister.
Bana probably suffers the most career damage from taking on this Las Vegas venture, huffing and puffing with endeavor, but adding nothing to his acting repertoire with this poorly-developed role, and seems to be heading ominously towards pre-Hulk days.
By the time the movie wraps up, you’re not much further from where you were at the beginning, despite two precious hours gone by, which is a cardinal sin for any director, hot shot or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running Time: Approximately 125min
Rating: PG | April 20
|
Title
|
Breach (2007) "You can't find treason until you've dug all the way in."
Director: Billy Ray| Starring: Chris Cooper, Ryan Phillippe, Laura Linney, Caroline Dhavernas
|
|
|
|
Review
|
I went into Breach just 15 minutes after Shooter, the second movie in a row that involved a betrayal of the American system by enemies from within, except that this was based on the real-life events of one Robert Hanssen, a brilliant top-level FBI operative who was found guilty of treason and espionage against America. From the film’s opening scene based on actual newsreel footage announcing the conviction of Hanssen, it was clear that Breach was less slam-bang machismo, more simmering sophistication. All the flaws of Shooter get magnified when you have a movie like Breach, but then again, both films have very different target audiences and probably very different box-office performances as well.
Throughout his 25-year career with the Bureau, Hanssen spent more than two decades of his service systematically selling a hoard of valuable classified documents to Russia during the Cold War—and subsequently to the former Soviet Union. Hanssen's crimes apparently caused the deaths of at least 50 agents, including KGB agents who were spying on behalf of America, as well as the leakage of U.S. emergency protocol for the relocation of the president in the event of a nuclear attack.
Hanssen was arrested only on February 18, 2001 after investigative work by more than 500 men and women in the FBI, just months before his official retirement, and before 911. His assertions that his extreme actions were partly motivated by the need to expose the neglected flaws in America’s security systems, must have been particularly chilling in the aftermath of 911.
The movie deals with the final months up to Hanssen’s arrest, when the FBI decided on a risky gamble to plant a mole close to Hanssen, in the hopes that a young and untested agent would prove more successful at gaining his trust, than a guarded and experienced one would. Ryan Phillippe plays Eric O’Neill, the ambitious upstart who is clueless about the magnitude of the assignment he has undertaken until he is in too deep.
The real O’Neill is a consultant on this movie, which probably explains the depth and quality of Breach, but it may be a bit unfair to use that to take credit away from Phillippe’s rather effective performance. Actually, this is the first time I’ve seen any of Phillippe’s movies and while he may seem bland in the first half, he does grow his character by film’s end to sufficiently paint the picture of a rookie tested to the limits of his endurance and sanity by a boss who is the very personification of paranoia.
Chris Cooper is unsurprisingly vintage material as he takes on yet another extremely challenging and complex role as Robert Hanssen, carefully and deftly bringing out the many textures and layers of a villain who is both arrogant yet God-fearing, tender yet creepily perverted, authoritative and yet morally corrupted. Cooper shows no let-up in demanding better from himself, since his last equally powerful role as seasoned jockey Tom Smith (Seabiscuit), and hopefully, this leads to more quality offers and less dodgy ones (The Bourne Identity).
O’Neill is initially briefed by his handler to gather evidence of Hanssen’s sexually perverted online behaviour, but gradually becomes frustrated enough by Hanssen’s psychological attacks to demand the truth, and Laura Linney plays the superior-under-fire with the same tenacity, showing her knack for portraying tough women under extraordinary pressure. Nonetheless, she may need to flex more muscle to avoid the dreaded typecast effect. Her FBI honcho turn, while excellent, is almost indistinguishable from the lawyer under supernatural siege (The Exorcism of Emily Rose). Caroline Dhavernas takes on the other main female character in the movie as Juliana, O’Neill’s young wife, who unwittingly becomes embroiled in her husband’s tortuous assignment. The role is typically one that could end up being annoying and forgettable, but new face Dhavernas somehow manages to bring across a good balance of strength and vulnerability in her bright-eyed, clean scrubbed performance.
The strong ensemble, and even the supporting cast, is easily Breach’s greatest highlight, and just watching them strut their stuff is a treat, but those expecting spectacular car chases and intense action sequences will be disappointed. Breach’s spy-versus-spy tension is slowly stirred, not shaken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running Time: Approximately 120min
Rating: NC16 (For brief sexual content) | April 17
|
Title
|
Shooter (2007) "Yesterday was about box-office money. Today still is."
Director: Antoine Fuqua | Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Michael Pẽna, Danny Glover, Kate Mara
|
|
|
|
Review
|
For a movie about a sharpshooter, it oddly doesn’t take keen observation to notice what’s amiss in this picture – plenty. Given what Antoine Fuqua did with Training Day and King Arthur, this is awkwardly diluted by his standards. There’s probably a truckload of deleted sex-blood-guts scenes waiting to burst on a Director’s Cut DVD; either that or the audience is expected to swallow wild character arcs and gaping plot holes 2,000 yards wide.
Wahlberg plays Bob Lee Swagger (this ranks right up there with Xenia Onatopp on Hollywood’s Cheesiest Names) a brilliant sniper who voluntarily goes into exile after a botched operation in Ethiopia leaves him with a dead comrade and a load of disillusionment with the government that left him to die.
Fast-forward three years, and Swagger is offered a chance at redemption by shady G-Man Colonel Issac Johnson (Glover). Posed with the challenge of predicting a potential assassin’s plans to take down the U.S. President from 2,000 yards, it takes only seconds before Swagger says yes to the Colonel, and from there, the movie throws credibility out the window. Swagger finds himself caught up in a clumsy conspiracy and framed for an assassination he didn’t do. The rest of the movie predominantly focuses on Swagger pulling every trick he knows to stay alive and to get back at Johnson’s gang.
Wahlberg recycles his scowling act from The Departed to good effect as a post-911 Rambo, but the rest of the cast seem like just clichéd passengers along for the ride with very little to do. Michael Pẽna (World Trade Center) is the typical rookie FBI agent who incredibly spots all the inconsistencies that none of his colleagues can. Glover hasn’t had a decent role in years and Shooter does nothing to break that trend.
Rhona Mitra and Kate Mara serve up voluptuous eye candy as an FBI secretary and the dead comrade’s widow respectively. By the time the movie reaches its ridiculous Death-Wish-style conclusion, you’re probably left counting all the head-scratching moments that threaten to turn this action showpiece into comedy.
How can Swagger stay one step ahead of his foes (decimating a 24-man crack team in minutes) and still be the gullible puppy who didn’t remember his lesson about trusting the government? How can the widow go from busty battered schoolteacher to unscratched bloodthirsty accomplice in just a few scenes? (Without depicting the kind of torture she endured, it’s hard to accept how she snaps at the end)
Shooter is ultimately a noisy, badaboom ride that takes the fun out of itself by not tightening the tension or giving Swagger a worthy adversary to work with (in that sense, even draggy Enemy At The Gates seems marginally better), given its over-the-top plotline and showy attempts at being an indictment of the government’s practices and flaws. For those who just want the carnage and cleavage, this movie is probably still worth a watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running Time: Approximately 120min
Rating: PG
|
|
|
|
|